![]() Which software do you prefer to make HDR images? Share it in the comments below. I also save time by simply making the HDR image and color correcting the same within Lightroom itself. I always choose yes even when using my tripod because the camera sometimes tilts down slightly while capturing the photos if I am using a heavy lens. A prompt will pop up asking if you want it to align your photos. Secondly the sharpness and saturation that I get in my images are better for my post processing taste. Next, open Photomatix essentials and import your photos. Recently I thought of trying the HDR Merge feature in Adobe Lightroom and I found it better than Photomatix for a couple of reasons.įirstly I get better deghosting results, so this sames me a lot of time that I otherwise will have to give in rectifying it. To conclude this post, I would share that Photomatix was my all-time favourite HDR image processing software but I always had to import my HDR images to Lightroom to give the final touch. I personally would go with the Lightroom version (less saturated) as I have more room to play with the colors and can adjust it as per my choice. Now it is completely up to you which approach you wish to take, proceed with your color correction using a less saturated imaged or use a more saturated file to same your time. SaturationĪs you can see in the image above or in any of the images in this article, you will realise that the Photomatix version has more saturation of colors as compared to the Lightroom version. Earlier I had to import the Photomatix processed image to Lightroom in order to increase the sharpness. Whereas the default HDR image processed by Lightroom done not has softness, it looks sharp. The default HDR image processed by Photomatix has softness to it, this is something I have been having issues with since the time I started using this software. If my HDR image has moving elements and requires deghosting, I would prefer using Adobe LightroomCC over Photomatix. Whereas the image on the right has done a great job in applying the deghosting effect, it appears that the people were stationary. If you look at the image on the left, the HDR image processing software has not done a great job in rectifying the ghosting effect, as you can see the people in the frame appear somewhat transparent. In the case of this image, people were moving as I clicked 5 different exposures. Otherwise, LR/Enfuse is quite good, and popular with architectural. While you are clicking multiple exposures, there are possibilities that elements in your frame might me in motion. if you like the natural look, Photoshop and LR will give you the most realistic looking HDR. Deghosting LEFT: HDR image processed using Photomatix | RIGHT: HDR image processed using Adobe Lightroom CC This comparison will show how Adobe Lightroom and Photomatix process multiple exposures into one. I am not saying that Photomatix is bad software of HDR processing, but in this particular post I am going to compare the non-edited images as processed by respective softwares. My recommendation if you use Photomatix for HDR real estate photography is to take. But, only until I tried out the HDR Merge feature in Lightroom CC. You simply import your bracketed shots and select a tone mapping preset. There must be many softwares out there in the market, but my personal favourite from the past 5 years has been Photomatix. Thank you Bartek for let me in on your great HDR project and also for the support.The HDR image technique is all about clicking multiple exposures on your camera and then merging them into one using an HDR image processing software. Visit his website and buy the software since it's not expensive and you can get great professional results. Bartek will reply you fast enough and can also make a correct copy in a couple of days. Support is almost direct since if you have any question Mr. You can even use the curves to improve the photo, apply rotation and alignment at best level and you can even test it on a small part of the image for faster preview results. Since you can do almost everything to accomplish the best result from the combining photos this turns out to be my choice now. but after trying easyHDR things start to be more simplified on the final part of the photos on Photoshop. One real difference here is that HDR Efex Pro relies on the underlying Raw processing of Photoshop or Lightroom while Photomatix Pro can operate in either moderunning stand-alone with its own Raw processing or as an Adobe plug-in taking advantage of Adobes ACR Raw processor. Up until today and after having exchange a lot of emails with the creator of easyHDR (Bartek Okonek) I was using Photomatix with some success. A lot of people have been asking me what software I've been using for the HDR creation and what is for me the best one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |